<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Versatile Shure SM58 Vocal Microphone, Hammer or Humming Along?</title> <atom:link href="http://homemusicrecording.com/mics-and-cables/shure-sm58/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://homemusicrecording.com/mics-and-cables/shure-sm58/</link> <description>Build a Music Recording Studio at Home</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Music Recording Center</title><link>http://homemusicrecording.com/mics-and-cables/shure-sm58/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link> <dc:creator>Music Recording Center</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:56:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homemusicrecording.com/digital/mics_cables/shure-sm58/#comment-74</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Shure SM58 - The Old Mics Are The Best?&lt;/strong&gt;Everyone has a Shure SM58? Right?
Here&#039;s why - over at homemusicrecording.com
I never thought of using my SM58 to hammer the stage together though!
Glen
...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Shure SM58 &#8211; The Old Mics Are The Best?</strong></p><p>Everyone has a Shure SM58? Right?<br
/> Here&#39;s why &#8211; over at homemusicrecording.com<br
/> I never thought of using my SM58 to hammer the stage together though!<br
/> Glen<br
/> &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Mills</title><link>http://homemusicrecording.com/mics-and-cables/shure-sm58/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link> <dc:creator>Steve Mills</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:27:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homemusicrecording.com/digital/mics_cables/shure-sm58/#comment-71</guid> <description>Good point Chit productions. I have found the SM58 to be great in some circumstances, and others a feedback producing nightmare. Now i know why... thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Chit productions. I have found the SM58 to be great in some circumstances, and others a feedback producing nightmare. Now i know why&#8230; thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken Johnstone</title><link>http://homemusicrecording.com/mics-and-cables/shure-sm58/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link> <dc:creator>Ken Johnstone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:35:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homemusicrecording.com/digital/mics_cables/shure-sm58/#comment-72</guid> <description>Excellent advice - thanks CHITT!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent advice &#8211; thanks CHITT!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CHiTT Productions</title><link>http://homemusicrecording.com/mics-and-cables/shure-sm58/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link> <dc:creator>CHiTT Productions</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:44:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.homemusicrecording.com/digital/mics_cables/shure-sm58/#comment-73</guid> <description>Believe it or not &amp; despite the hype, the Beta 58 is a notorious feedback trap.  I know, I know, the literature says &quot;exceptional gain before feedback&quot; but talk to people in the industry and they&#039;ll tell you they stray away from the Beta 58.  Why?  A hypercardioid polar pattern means a tighter pickup in the front but it comes with a tradeoff.   The direct rear of the microphone is the Beta 58&#039;s weakspot, so if you&#039;ve got your monitors placed 180 degrees off axis (where the butt of the mic is pointing), the Beta 58 will pick up more sound from the monitors and create feedback.  The traditional cardioid pattern of the SM58 is less tempermental as far as monitor placement is concerned.With proper monitor placement (about 120 degrees off axis or so) the Beta 58 lives up to its name as a feedback killer, but let&#039;s face it: a sound engineer can spend all his/her time placing a mic in the right spot just to have the &quot;talent&quot; come in and move stuff around and muck everything up.  As far as real-world application goes, I&#039;d rather have a less accurate frequency response in a live situation just to never hear the monitors squeal.  Save yourself the extra cash and go with an old skool SM58-- the sound engineer will thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not &amp; despite the hype, the Beta 58 is a notorious feedback trap.  I know, I know, the literature says &#8220;exceptional gain before feedback&#8221; but talk to people in the industry and they&#8217;ll tell you they stray away from the Beta 58.  Why?  A hypercardioid polar pattern means a tighter pickup in the front but it comes with a tradeoff.   The direct rear of the microphone is the Beta 58&#8217;s weakspot, so if you&#8217;ve got your monitors placed 180 degrees off axis (where the butt of the mic is pointing), the Beta 58 will pick up more sound from the monitors and create feedback.  The traditional cardioid pattern of the SM58 is less tempermental as far as monitor placement is concerned.</p><p>With proper monitor placement (about 120 degrees off axis or so) the Beta 58 lives up to its name as a feedback killer, but let&#8217;s face it: a sound engineer can spend all his/her time placing a mic in the right spot just to have the &#8220;talent&#8221; come in and move stuff around and muck everything up.  As far as real-world application goes, I&#8217;d rather have a less accurate frequency response in a live situation just to never hear the monitors squeal.  Save yourself the extra cash and go with an old skool SM58&#8211; the sound engineer will thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/27 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: daewoo.websitewelcome.com @ 2010-03-22 02:12:51 -->